Hversu m\u00f6rg t\u00e6kif\u00e6ri \u00e1 ma\u00f0ur a\u00f0 gefa einhverjum \u00e1\u00f0ur en ma\u00f0ur afskrifar hann sem drullusokk? spur\u00f0i Klikkun.<\/p>\n
\u00c9g held ekki a\u00f0 s\u00e9 til nein \u00feumalputtaregla \u00ed \u00fev\u00ed sambandi. \u00de\u00fa \u00fearft heldur ekkert a\u00f0 velta \u00fev\u00ed fyrir \u00fe\u00e9r ef \u00fe\u00fa bara horfist \u00ed augu vi\u00f0 sj\u00e1lfan \u00feig og vi\u00f0urkennir tilfinningar sem eru af einhverjum dularfullum \u00e1st\u00e6\u00f0um feimnism\u00e1l. (T.d. h\u00f6fnunarkennd, afbr\u00fd\u00f0isemi, bitur\u00f0, ni\u00f0url\u00e6ging, einmannaleiki og hefnar\u00feorsti.) Ef \u00fe\u00fa gefur sk\u00fdr skilabo\u00f0 um lei\u00f0 og r\u00e9ttl\u00e6tiskennd \u00fe\u00edn er s\u00e6r\u00f0, munu drullusokkar og dr\u00e6sur hverfa \u00far l\u00edfi \u00fe\u00ednu af sj\u00e1lfsd\u00e1\u00f0um. \u00de\u00fa ver\u00f0ur kannski aldrei neitt rosalega vins\u00e6ll en \u00fe\u00fa getur allavega treyst \u00feeim sem eftir standa.<\/p>\n
\u00c9g er ekki a\u00f0 segja a\u00f0 fyrirgefning s\u00e9 sl\u00e6m. \u00c1rekstrar og s\u00e6ttir eru hluti af mannlegum samskiptum. En ekki „fyrirgefa“ \u00fat \u00ed lofti\u00f0 \u00e1n \u00feess a\u00f0 m\u00e1lin s\u00e9u ger\u00f0 upp. „\u00c6, h\u00fan bara eitthva\u00f0 b\u00e1gt“ er oftast bara frasi til a\u00f0 komast hj\u00e1 tilfinningalegu uppgj\u00f6ri.<\/p>\n
En ef \u00fe\u00fa heldur a\u00f0 \u00fea\u00f0 a\u00f0 vera „g\u00f3\u00f0 manneskja“ feli \u00ed s\u00e9r botnlaust umbur\u00f0arlyndi, ertu d\u00e6mdur til a\u00f0 ver\u00f0a f\u00f3rnarlamb. L\u00edf \u00feitt ver\u00f0ur samfelld vins\u00e6ldasamkeppni. \u00de\u00fa \u00feorir ekki a\u00f0 bera h\u00f6nd yfir h\u00f6fu\u00f0 \u00fe\u00e9r e\u00f0a krefjast r\u00e9ttar \u00fe\u00edns. \u00de\u00fa f\u00e6r\u00f0 vi\u00f0urkenningu fyrir a\u00f0 vera „skilningsr\u00edkur“ \u00feegar sta\u00f0reyndin er s\u00fa a\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fa hefur bara ekki kjark til a\u00f0 segja kvalara \u00fe\u00ednum a\u00f0 fara til fjandans. Aflei\u00f0ingin er s\u00fa a\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fa leikur hlutverk f\u00f3rnarlambsins.<\/p>\n
\u00deegar \u00fe\u00fa ert festir \u00feig \u00ed hlutverkinu „ferlega n\u00e6s n\u00e1ungi“ gerast skelfilegir hlutir.
\n\u00cd fyrsta lagi mun f\u00f3lk misnota \u00feig gengdarlaust.
\n\u00cd \u00f6\u00f0ru lagi ver\u00f0ur \u00fatiloka\u00f0 fyrir anna\u00f0 f\u00f3lk a\u00f0 vita hvar \u00fea\u00f0 hefur \u00feig. \u00de\u00fa ert nefnilega svo „ind\u00e6ll“ a\u00f0 \u00fe\u00fa gefur aldrei hei\u00f0arleg skilabo\u00f0.<\/p>\n
\u00dev\u00ed tek \u00e9g undir \u00fea\u00f0 me\u00f0 Martin McDonagh (leiksk\u00e1ld sem skrifa\u00f0i m.a. Fegur\u00f0ardrottninguna fr\u00e1 L\u00ednakri og Koddamanninn) a\u00f0 „ekkert er h\u00e6ttulegra en ind\u00e6lt f\u00f3lk“.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Hversu m\u00f6rg t\u00e6kif\u00e6ri \u00e1 ma\u00f0ur a\u00f0 gefa einhverjum \u00e1\u00f0ur en ma\u00f0ur afskrifar hann sem drullusokk? spur\u00f0i Klikkun. \u00c9g held ekki a\u00f0 s\u00e9 til nein \u00feumalputtaregla \u00ed \u00fev\u00ed sambandi. \u00de\u00fa \u00fearft heldur ekkert a\u00f0 velta \u00fev\u00ed fyrir \u00fe\u00e9r ef \u00fe\u00fa bara … Halda \u00e1fram a\u00f0 lesa